J9 Digital Theory: DAO governance is more like an ecological process: governance is native to the network and continues to evolve

DAO governance is more like an ecological process: governance is native to the network and continues to evolve.

The goal of a DAO should not be to reproduce offline governance online - after trial and error, a web-native organization cannot and should not function like a government in geographic units, as the constraints are different.Once the online governance model evolves to a certain level, it should be different and better than the offline model because of its speed, scale, granularity, programmability, composability, and binding to the Internet and blockchainall have an advantage.

What if the DAO reversed the pattern?

If the goal of DAO governance is not to achieve consensus on the limited choices communicated by management, but to drive people to disagree on the decisions of the various organizations.If a large community is too big and it is difficult to collaborate, it will continue to be divided into more effective small communities to build value together.

The prospect of DAO governance may be forking: Dividing people through governance, creating sub-communities - where members share the same goals and can create projects that match their own vision.Forks in this sense are the ultimate form of decentralization.Governance thus becomes the cornerstone of the social picture, where people can find companionship, share and realize common interests.

In its simplest form, this governance is a decentralized governance that incentivizes the community to share and rate preferences.The ecosystem is encouraged to evolve by forming child DAOs through healthy divergence.

From this point of view, the governance mechanism is less defensive - less energy is spent on how to protect the entire DAO from attack - it becomes more aggressive and more interesting - more focused on how to make governanceTo be a means of entertainment, social discovery, dissemination.

Of course, there is no one-size-fits-all model for DAO governance.We do not advocate that every DAO immediately get hotheaded and start forking.In fact, forking should be the last resort.What we're trying to say is that different types of governance allow different organizations to have different standards for what they think are important to their systems.Essentially, biodiversity protects entire ecosystems.

Of course, new models still need to be explored, ways to operate, and gaps to be filled.We hope this article will lead to some discussion.Of course discussion is one thing, practice is another.

Risk warning:

The content of this article is only for information sharing, and does not promote or endorse any business and investment behavior. Readers are requested to strictly abide by the laws and regulations of the region where they are located, and do not participate in any illegal financial activities.